Working Paper Diversificación productiva 2025

Beneficiation vs. Knowledge-based: Dead ends and steppingstones to productive diversification

Sebastián Bustos, Miguel Ángel Santos

Published
Working Paper
Language
English
Released
2025

Abstract

The global resurgence of industrial policy has revived the appeal of downstream diversification (beneficiation) – adding value to raw materials – as a development strategy. Despite this intuitive appeal, empirical evidence of its effectiveness remains scarce, with few real-world success stories. We address this gap through a novel em- pirical analysis of export product co-location and new relatedness metrics to explain observed diversification patterns. Our results show that product co-location patterns are driven primarily by similarities in occupational structures. Industries sharing high-skill occupations (and to a lesser extent, non-tradable inputs) are strong predic- tors of diversification. Conversely, relatedness metrics based on value-chain linkages (existing upstream inputs) have weak to no predictive power. These findings suggest rethinking development strategies focused on adding v

Citar este paper

Cómo citar en BibTeX

@techreport{sebastinbustos2025,
  author    = {Sebastián Bustos, Miguel Ángel Santos},
  title     = {Beneficiation vs. Knowledge-based: Dead ends and steppingstones to productive diversification},
  year      = {2025},
  url       = {/papers/beneficiation-vs-knowledge-based-productive-diversification/}
}